FiveTech Software tech support forums

by **Enrico Maria Giordano** » Sun May 07, 2017 10:22 am

If we cannot have intermediate values, 4 is better.

EMG

by **cnavarro** » Sun May 07, 2017 5:50 pm

Please, if you changed Int with round, leave INT, and try
Thanks for your test
I'm outside these days

by **Enrico Maria Giordano** » Sun May 07, 2017 9:28 pm

With INT() the best value is 5.

EMG

by **cnavarro** » Mon May 08, 2017 10:03 pm

Enrico
I can not find the difference of 5 between the versions
I use GetSysMetrics as a reference
I'm still looking for

by **Enrico Maria Giordano** » Tue May 09, 2017 8:31 am

Ok, thank you.

EMG

by **Enrico Maria Giordano** » Sat May 20, 2017 6:05 pm

The problem has not been fixed in FWH 17.05. :-(

EMG

by **cnavarro** » Sat May 20, 2017 6:47 pm

Enrico
Attach or send me an image with the previous height and the current height. I do not see the difference well
Thank you

by **Enrico Maria Giordano** » Sat May 20, 2017 7:47 pm

The fix is

Code: Select all Expand view: ChgMenuMea( pMitStruct, Round( nWText * nFw, 0 ), ; if( oItem:lSeparator, Int( nHItem * GetnHeightItem() ),; Max( Int( nHItem * GetnHeightItem() * if( !lHFont, 1.5, 1 ) ) + 5, GetSysMetrics( 15 ) ) ) )

Please note + 5.

EMG

by **cnavarro** » Sat May 20, 2017 8:26 pm

Enrico, yes, I know it
But I have not found why it has changed by 5 pixels the height

by **Enrico Maria Giordano** » Mon Jun 05, 2017 7:29 am

Bug still pending. :-)

EMG

by **cnavarro** » Mon Jun 05, 2017 11:01 am

Try

MENU oMenu HEIGHT 2.075 and comment

by **Enrico Maria Giordano** » Mon Jun 05, 2017 11:19 am

Height 2 seems to be fine:

EMG

by **cnavarro** » Mon Jun 05, 2017 11:24 am

Not with 2.075 ?

by **Enrico Maria Giordano** » Mon Jun 05, 2017 11:31 am

Yes, you are right, 2 or 2.075 it's the same, the height doesn't change.

EMG

by **Enrico Maria Giordano** » Tue Jun 27, 2017 9:59 am

In the new FWH release this bug is still there.

EMG

TMenuItem height [Fixed]