New FWH 16.06

[cnavarro]

Look my previous message

Thanks Enrico

[Enrico Maria Giordano]

Enrico, change line 239 in class

I get

Code: Select all  Expand view

tribbon.prg(239) Error E0030  Syntax error: "syntax error at 'APROMPTS'"

I can't find the error...

EMG

[Enrico Maria Giordano]

Ok, found: your code has strange character embedded. Please check it!

Anyway, now the ribbonbar works again. But please, let's public a new FWH build! This fix is too much important!

EMG

[Enrico Maria Giordano]

Ok, found: your code has strange character embedded. Please check it!

Probably is not your code but the copy/paste operation in this forum.

EMG

[Antonio Linares]

Hakan,

I had no time today

I will try to do it tomorrow, thanks

[Horizon]

Hakan,

I had no time today

I will try to do it tomorrow, thanks

No problem.

It can be after new build that is fixed in ribbonbar error.

Thank you.

[RAMESHBABU]

* CLASS TRichEdit5

- New: METHOD nPages( lRefresh )
- New: METHOD LastLineVisible()
- Updated: sample TESTRTF5.PRG

I am getting Linking error : Unresolved external '_HB_FUN_BUILDRICHEDITBAR'
from the TestRtf5.prg

-Ramesh Babu P

[cnavarro]

* CLASS TRichEdit5

- New: METHOD nPages( lRefresh )
- New: METHOD LastLineVisible()
- Updated: sample TESTRTF5.PRG

I am getting Linking error : Unresolved external '_HB_FUN_BUILDRICHEDITBAR'
from the TestRtf5.prg

-Ramesh Babu P

At moment
remove the declaration of static in the function BUILDRICHEDITBAR in \source \function\memoedit.prg or copy this function in TestRtf5.prg
Thanks

[RAMESHBABU]

Ok. I have done it as you said. It is working now.

Thanks,

-Ramesh Babu P

[Antonio Linares]

A New FWH 16.06 build 2 is already available

viewtopic.php?p=193101

[TimStone]

Antonio,

On the notes, you have 15.06 as the June build, but it is actually an August release. It might be less confusing to change that in the description. We know the numbers no longer match the month ( which is fine ) but we often remember them by when they came out.

Tim

[Antonio Linares]

Tim,

The version number should match the year and month, but we are one month delayed

[TimStone]

That is fine ... then 16.06 should have actually been 16.07.

Many months ago you asked if monthly updates were necessary, and we all agreed that it was OK to just release them when ready, and it was not required to have one every month. This update was actually released late July ( 07 ), or early August ( 08 ).

Tim

[Antonio Linares]

Yes, I agree with you, we should have named it 16.07

Thanks for the observation

[TimStone]

I noticed there was a 2nd release of this, but some issues still being resolved. Are you planning a 3rd build ? If so, I will wait and download it when it's ready.