toninhofwi wrote:Enrico this new bcc is clang based, if you don't like Linux, maybe you don't like clang too.
I like BCC because is small and simple to use. There is no so much differences between normal and clang version in size and use. So I'd happily use clang version if only I could solve the problem that I reported above.
I already made some test with pure C and It seemed faster in compiling and producing a smaller EXE. I don't know if this is true with [x]Harbour/FWH EXEs too. That's the reason why I'm trying to compile xHarbour with clang version, without success so far.
EMG