Prototype missing?

[Enrico Maria Giordano]

The standard API _parc() accepts two parameter! Harbour choices are wrong and only add confusion to the crystal clear Clipper APIs.

EMG

[Enrico Maria Giordano]

Antonio, do you give up?

EMG

[Antonio Linares]

No, never

I have emailed you my proposal for the way to go

[Enrico Maria Giordano]

I received (and already answered) the "use mak" suggestion. But here I was referring to the hb_parvc() problem: can we use hb_parc() instead? Why using hb_parvc()? Please reread the thread.

EMG

[Antonio Linares]

Enrico,

You may use a define:

#define hb_parvc( x, y ) hb_parc( x, y )

The problem is that Harbour hb_parc() no longer support two parameters

[Enrico Maria Giordano]

Enrico,

You may use a define:

#define hb_parvc( x, y ) hb_parc( x, y )

The problem is that Harbour hb_parc() no longer support two parameters

The second parameter is the index of the array if the first parameter is an array. I can't believe that Harbour's developers have changed the Clipper API interface!

EMG