![Image](https://github.com/FiveTechSoft/screenshots/blob/master/modharbour_trace.jpg?raw=true)
libharbour.dll virtual machine activity on dbwin32
- Antonio Linares
- Site Admin
- Posts: 42508
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 5:47 pm
- Location: Spain
- Has thanked: 30 times
- Been thanked: 72 times
- Contact:
- Carles
- Posts: 1149
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 2:34 pm
- Location: Barcelona
- Been thanked: 7 times
- Contact:
Re: libharbour.dll virtual machine activity on dbwin32
Mr. Linares,
Incredible the calls that are made to hb_xbfree.
C.
Incredible the calls that are made to hb_xbfree.
C.
Salutacions, saludos, regards
"...programar es fácil, hacer programas es difícil..."
UT Page -> https://carles9000.github.io/
Forum UT -> https://discord.gg/bq8a9yGMWh
Skype -> https://join.skype.com/cnzQg3Kr1dnk
"...programar es fácil, hacer programas es difícil..."
UT Page -> https://carles9000.github.io/
Forum UT -> https://discord.gg/bq8a9yGMWh
Skype -> https://join.skype.com/cnzQg3Kr1dnk
- Otto
- Posts: 6403
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 7:07 pm
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
- Contact:
Re: libharbour.dll virtual machine activity on dbwin32
Dear Antonio,
Can you please explain what these tests are about?
Best regards,
Otto
Can you please explain what these tests are about?
Best regards,
Otto
********************************************************************
mod harbour - Vamos a la conquista de la Web
modharbour.org
https://www.facebook.com/groups/modharbour.club
********************************************************************
mod harbour - Vamos a la conquista de la Web
modharbour.org
https://www.facebook.com/groups/modharbour.club
********************************************************************
- Antonio Linares
- Site Admin
- Posts: 42508
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 5:47 pm
- Location: Spain
- Has thanked: 30 times
- Been thanked: 72 times
- Contact:
Re: libharbour.dll virtual machine activity on dbwin32
Dear Otto,
we have found that building Harbour with these flags:
set HB_USER_CFLAGS=-DHB_FM_STATISTICS_OFF -DHB_FM_WIN_ALLOC
the resulting libharbour.dll manages memory much better, as we use the standard Windows API LocalAlloc(), LocalRealloc(), LocalFree(), etc to manage the memory on Windows
Also, modifying mod_harbour's entry.c this way (two calls to OutputDebugString()) makes memory liberation work much better:
we have found that building Harbour with these flags:
set HB_USER_CFLAGS=-DHB_FM_STATISTICS_OFF -DHB_FM_WIN_ALLOC
the resulting libharbour.dll manages memory much better, as we use the standard Windows API LocalAlloc(), LocalRealloc(), LocalFree(), etc to manage the memory on Windows
Also, modifying mod_harbour's entry.c this way (two calls to OutputDebugString()) makes memory liberation work much better:
Code: Select all | Expand
#include <Windows.h>
#include <hbapi.h>
#include <hbvm.h>
static void * pRequestRec;
HB_EXPORT_ATTR int hb_apache( void * _pRequestRec )
{
int iResult;
pRequestRec = _pRequestRec;
hb_vmInit( HB_TRUE );
OutputDebugString( "after hb_vmInit()\n" );
iResult = hb_vmQuit();
OutputDebugString( "after hb_vmQuit()\n" );
return iResult;
}
void * GetRequestRec( void )
{
return pRequestRec;
}
HB_FUNC( AP_ENTRY )
{
hb_apache( NULL );
}