FiveTech Software tech support forums

Mr James Scoped orders ( OrdSetRelation or SET RELATION .. SCOPED ) worked well for me for many years. Like you said it is always a good idea to link tables with IDs not by names. Apart from the fact that is a safe and good programming ...

... the action clause, you also need to set order to the corresponding new index and re-position the record if necessary. Note: You can include sort orders inside the command like this:    HEADERS " Part ", " Description ", " Manufacturer ", " UPC ", ...

... )  So, it does not refresh the browse with the new set of arrays. Apparently there is a method I need to add to push the refresh using the new orders. The logic here: If the setting is showing all records, it substitutes the second order, does a refresh and dialog update and a couple of other ...

Gunther,

You write in a message before that this array are always on first ranking and after this the indexes with INDEX ON... added.

Just lie any other rdd INDEX ON without ADDITIVE clause will clear all the orders prior to creation.

... recs - Slow. For sure you dont never need the 330.000 when the parent is only 4000. I think parent its related with some activity period. For ex. orders in 2015. If you have any date field in child table refreing the period or last order date then you could do: cDatePerido := "01/10/2015" ...

... live. And a test in certain routines to see if it is connected otherwise it let you do anything but: Updates, New records, changing index orders You will continue to work disconnected and as soon as you get connected again everything comes back to normal operation. With this we hope to ...

... using ads these days. Harbour. Creo que el problema esta en : OrdKeyGoto( n ) move record to n in active order but "temp" has no active orders .

... struct index file right? Yes. This approach didn't foresee to keep the struct file name index and it might not be needed. You simply ask for the orders (tags) right? Yes. The struct file name itself is not needed ? Yes. The only thing we need is to open all indexes with the table if SET AUTO ...

... of the struct index file right? This approach didn't foresee to keep the struct file name index and it might not be needed. You simply ask for the orders (tags) right? The struct file name itself is not needed ? The only thing we need is to open all indexes with the table if SET AUTO OPEN is true ...

... can be truly relational. For example, a DataSet can store one DataTable containing customers and another DataTable containing the customers' orders. These DataTable objects can then be related to one another within ADO.NET, thus recreating the relationship that exists within the relational ...

Antonio, Im finishing Set Scopes. What is the normal behaviour? The scope if not cleared it remains with the index athough we change orders? I mean : sele 0use xtableset index to index1,index2set order to index1set scope to exp1,exp2browse()  //with scopeset order to index2Browse() ...

... seek) when sort order is changed and the user can continue to type the filter expression. He can also view the filtered records in different sort orders. Actually filter has nothing to do with sort order and does not require index. When programmer does not specify oBrw:cFilterFld, xbrowse assigns ...

... del documento "pedido" a pdf. Este es un ejemplo que ya hace algo en concreto. For me a good example of program would be a form of sales orders that take articles and data customers. These articles and customers would have their forms new-delete-modification. There would be a user login ...

... CRM e so on. We all use Harbour language but we use different data structures that very likely contain more or less the same data: customers, orders, invoices, transactions, bill of materials and so on. The problem is that the field's name is different, table's name is different and probably ...

... module in your code so that you have record visibility between your workstations. Also, in many service shops you many have 10 or so ( open ) work orders in a day and you can have multiple people ( potentially ) modifying the same record at the same time so you need to account for that before you ...