FiveTech Software tech support forums

----------------------------------------- NEW VERSION 02/01/2016 ----------------------------

- Minor bugs fixed
- Optimization code

https://bitbucket.org/fivetech/fivewin- ... edit34.zip

... Visual Studio 2013. Other than the expected bugs from such a large application ( EXE files run about 10 MB in size ), and such massive internal optimization, it is running quite well. My client is very happy with the performance, and soon we will put it into far more companies. I'm glad we made ...

... results, or an smart buffer to moderate the IO. I've solved the problems, and so Tim and James did, so it doesn't look like 'premature optimization', better call it 'reengineering' :) I see immediate uses of this solution for me: logging to files, html/xml generation, etc. In case of ...

... possible solution. I'm not sure what you mean--that the problem was in my code? I dont' know, but I know that you should not make "premature optimization". We don't need a general tool for buffered write. We need to clear understand if and where the problem is. EMG

... It worked, but I never gave much time to optimizing, or cleaning up variables ... just trapped problems and fixed it. When I started my "optimization project" 10 months ago, and started developing classes, it certainly cleaned up a lot of the code. However it's hard to maintain 100% ...

... likely offer most of the above Array support plus few additional methods. BIT Operators: -------------- xHarbour support (including compile time optimization) BIT operations: AND, OR, XOR, SHIFT RIGHT, SHIFT LEFT Except for 'XOR' C syntax is used: & == and | == or ^^ == xor >> == shift ...

... I have not been able to test last version due lack of time. Does it work with Access now?. Which RDBMS have you tested?. Regarding configuration optimization settings, please review adofuncs.prg Fw_OpenAdoConnection and FW_OpenRecordSet. They are high optimized and work very well. Also, for a ...

... I have not been able to test last version due lack of time. Does it work with Access now?. Which RDBMS have you tested?. Regarding configuration optimization settings, please review adofuncs.prg Fw_OpenAdoConnection and FW_OpenRecordSet. They are high optimized and work very well. Also, for a ...

... ADS files from Harbour at this time, but they do not include ADS 7 or 8. I still have that issue to work around. Right now I'm on a massive code optimization project with these files, so that will come "next month". I also have found some differences between the UE Studio and VS 2013 ...

... Editor on lines with errors - Search and Replace Dialog - Full implementation of the clipboard (Historical evidence) - Other improvements and optimization - Minor bugs - Drag & Drop implemented in Tree Project Complete application, downloaded from: https://bitbucket.org/navarro_cristobal/fivedit/downloads ...

Rao,

sorry but we still haven't a sample demonstrating that DBFCDX do optimize filters. My sample in another thread shows that there is no speed difference between using and not using indexes, so it looks like no optimization occur. Let's hope I'm wrong...

EMG

... No. I advise you NOT to create any conditional ( using for clause ) in the main CDX. Please note that conditional indexes are not used for filter optimization. Instead, create one additional TAG like this for every DBF (large and medium) INDEX ON DELETED() TAG DELETED When you browse a DBF, USE ...

... least some of the combinations. I think the point is, that some filters will be optimized if there is a useful index. And this is better than no optimization ever--which was the old way. You also have to consider probability. There are a few combinations of fields that users will search often, ...

... this filter SET FILTER TO FIELD -> cliente = "A" can not be optimized at all. As I said earlier, DBFCDX provides capabilities of optimization, provided the programmer wants to avail the benefits of these capabilities. In this case we can not say DBFCDX is slow. If there is an ...

Enrico,

Hmm, you can't compare with and without a filter to see optimization. It seems you would have to compare the filter compiled with xHarbour (with optimization) v.s. Clipper (without optimization).

James