Doug, > Run GTK+ on windows as an option? IMO we shouldn't, as we can directly access the Windows API and its GUI. No need for another layer. The beauty of FiveWin, FiveLinux, FWPPC, FiveMac, FiveIPhone is that they are the real compatibility ...
... which release you are going to make? It depends on which build you are interested in: an "official" release or the "trunk" (current one). IMO Harbour and xHarbour are so stable that the current build can safely be used (if problems are found you can always go to a previous build). Thats ...
... look the picture attached previous, you are see that I have success with buttos, folders and comboboxes, but the get... :( I've never try it, but IMO you have to handle the WM_NCPAINT msg. Try to write a msg handler for TGet... This info is from Win32s.hlp: WM_NCPAINT An application sends the ...
IMO the GET should not directly modify aData[ n ], because when it loses focus (though later on, it recovers it) then aData[ n ] is asigned with the GET contents (111). The GET should work on a local variable, and the bChange ...
IMO we should first agree on the formats to use: In order to save forms to files ("serialization") and later restore them, I would propose to use XML as it will provide us the greatest freedom to extend our "serialization" ...
... :-) According to Harbour developers, Harbour internally is more robust and better designed. Obviously, xHarbour developers won't agree on this. IMO it is a very good idea to keep the ability to build your application with both compilers, so you can decide for yourself :-)
... of developing Manuel disappeared. Some rumors told he would be ill. I don't regret the 50 Euros i payed because i use frequently TsBrowse which IMO is already worth that money. I don't thing you'll be able to encourage Manuel to complete this great browse. Regards, Detlef
Hello Antonio, I as well use wincmd since ever. But in this case you should have – IMO – a inside possibility to easy rename. Why do we need an easy tool to manage the demo prgs? For example: Yesterday I saw that copyright in xbrowser is from 2002. I could have used ...
IMO it has no sense to use the 2007 look on 256 colors, so once it is implemented as optional, you chould check the amount of colors and if they are 256 then don't use the 2007 clause