Andi I have tried that combination .. only made the results worse :( BuildxM @ECHO OFF CLSECHO ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿ECHO ³ FiveWin for xHarbour 17.07 (MSVC++) ...
Andi I have tried every conveivable combination of FWH (M) lib and this is the best results : echo c:\Fwh1707\lib\FiveHCM.lib >> msvc.tmp Hi Rick, You missed one library: You typed: ECHO c:\Fwh1707\lib\FiveHCM.lib ...
Andi I have tried every conveivable combination of FWH (M) lib and this is the best results : Buildxm @ECHO OFF CLSECHO ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿ECHO ³ FiveWin for xHarbour ...
Andi I am getting closer .. still something missing ... BuildxM @ECHO OFF CLSECHO ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿ECHO ³ FiveWin for xHarbour 17.07 (MSVC++) July 2017 ...
Andi I have downloaded xHarbour MSVC 2015 from Mel's site ... I have attempted to modify BuildxM and when I try to compile Tutor01.prg I get the errors below. I would appreciate any help. Thanks Rick Lipkin @ECHO OFFCLSECHO ...
Andi I have downloaded xHarbour MSVC 2015 from Mel's site ... I have attempted to modify BuildxM and when I try to compile Tutor01.prg I get the errors below. I would appreciate any help. Thanks Rick Lipkin @ECHO OFFCLSECHO ...
Andi, have you also a makefile-template for more then one .prg? Günther, hbmk2 gives you smart make process as follows: console example:for single program: hbmk2 -plat=win -comp=bcc -lhbmainstd program1.prgfor multi prg program: ...
Andi BRILLIANT !! Now that's what I'm talking About :D :D ... I may need some help getting the config correct and a working make file .. Thanks Rick Lipkin Hi Rick: Followings are examples, you may have to adjust to match ...
... between normal and clang version in size and use. So I'd happily use clang version if only I could solve the problem that I reported above. Andi post on harbour devel sometimes ago that BCC clang edition is very slow and now I read this: http://community.embarcadero.com/answers/my-questions/win-32-clang-is-very-slow ...
... is from Linux, a world that I don't like very much. Enrico this new bcc is clang based, if you don't like Linux, maybe you don't like clang too. Andi post on harbour devel sometimes ago that BCC clang edition is very slow and now I read this: http://community.embarcadero.com/answers/my-questions/win-32-clang-is-very-slow